Saturday, April 30, 2011

Murakush Caliphate of Amexum

Why Murakush? A new moors 10 reasons for growing under Murakush.


There are many entities and temples within the Moorish Divine and National Movement and after my research and hard diligent studies. I would like to state the reasons that I have chosen to become an active part of the Murakush Caliphate of Amexum. I will be stating these from the order of 10 to 1.

10. I will say that most of my online time is spent on the aboriginallawfirm.ning. This site is extremely informational on all topics and is really a center for informational emancipation


9. Blueprint for Moorish Liberation: This book has been instrumental in me dissolving the fictitious entity that was created and assisting in my families salvation and liberation financially and learning sustainability.


8. Intricate Studies in Civics: With the profiteering and engineering that has taken place against our peoples it is imperative that we study and learn the laws and its various applications. At Murakush the entire site and its main focus is on rebuilding our people civilly and empowering and liberating our fallen humanity.


7. Kush Krops: I love Kush and I love crops. Having an avenue that promotes the two of those which I believe is the plant for the “healing of the nations”.


6. Working Government: With Murakush, all of the various Moorish American groups can connect and have a government in place to protect and secure the freedom of our people . Communities for Immunities


5. Liberator Radio on blogtalk radio: One of the biggest changes in my growth is the media I allow to enter my pineal gland . This show is extremely informative and the posts and chat allow studies to be extended further after the show. I have since downloaded all shows and play them in my car.

4. The commerce game: I love being able to apply real solutions and benefit my family with the entities that I have created. It was ok to work for someone else, but I have given 2 weeks notice on my job and will be supporting my family with the entities I built through reading the solution book.

3. Solutions: Other groups I have studied are about the redemption of people at heart but where they differ from Murakush is in the aspect of, they leave you with a feeling of being powerless. There seems at the end to be no solution. “What can I do about it.” With Murakush not only is the solution provided but it also is backed by legal information for studious individuals to research further

2. Moors in Court Video: was the start of this Journey for me. I was amazed to see two brothers banging on the beast better than any lawyer could. Everything they said was based on the law and it was impressive to see two young men with the knowledge of ancient kings.

1. Shyaam and El Aemer: These brothers have been instrumental in my teachings and progression. They research and provide a wealth of information that has been vital for my liberation and progression. This has put my family in a better situation financially and also given me more time to spend with my family because I don't have to work the long hours I worked in voluntary servitude. Honors to the Nobles for all the work that you do

Check out the site at Science University



                                                  Brother 17X El
                            Murakush Caliphate of Amexum

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

NAS & DAMIAN "Jr. Gong" MARLEY ft K'naan TRIBES AT WAR OFFICIAL VIDEO



We must set aside differences and work together for a common good for the rise and upliftment of our people. Moor for the Record will be a platform of positives about all Moorish indigenous platforms. If you have a business or book and would like Moor For the Record to do a positive blog please contact us at dontmesswithmymoney@gmail.com  Also we will be promoting positively any indigenous websites and links to promote any companies that we are made aware of.   

The Mission Statement of Moor for the Record is to promote unity, solidarity and public informational support for the Moorish Divine and National Movement of Northwest Amexum.

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

The 5 Words Used to Control / Enslave You

The 5 Words Used to Control / Enslave You                http://www.activistpost.com/2011/04/5-words-used-to-control-enslave-you.html

Steven, Æ, Contributing Writer
Activist Post

 Note:   Many well-known freedom movement spokesmen/women have not been willing to fully discuss and expose this subject for reasons known only to them.  Why? Because, they either think it is too trivial, they do not fully understand it or perhaps in their mind, it's been debunked by an attorney, whom they give credence to, without doing their own thorough due diligence. It is also important to note that there are some well-intentioned lawyers who strive to assist in making our world a safer and better place for all to live. The intention of this article is to shine a bright light and empower you to help break the matrix grip.

First and foremost, it is vitally important to comprehend that everything in the business / commercial world is done by contract, both public and private.   Secondly, relationships are also contractual -- marital, parental and social (friendships).  You both consciously and unconsciously verbally contract all day long, and when merited, in written form as well.  

Words are understood to be very powerful and it is through spelling that spells are cast.   However, it is a very misunderstood fact that words used in everyday language most often do not have the same meaning in a legal sense (contractual or court setting).

What are these 5 words that are used to control / enslave you?  Person, resident, citizen, driver and passenger (all commercial terms).  In my humble opinion, these 5 words are the keys to casting the spell in the attorneys’ legal jargon trickery.  All commercial transactions / contracts have been designed to remove the men and women from the equation and replace with a legal fictional entity in the matrix system.

PERSON is a legal entity - a trust, corporation, partnership, association.   Don't be fooled by the attorney's statutory word trickery if you see  "natural person".  An adjective cannot change the root meaning of a word.   Plain and simple, it is impossible to be a "person".  You are either a man or woman - a living being.   A "person" is a dead entity and attorneys may only represent persons – commercial legal entities.


RESIDENT is the word term used to establish jurisdiction in a State (a legal entity).  To "reside" is a commercial term only used to establish domicile for tax revenue purposes. 

CITIZEN is the word term used to establish jurisdiction in a Federal district.  It is also a commercial term only used to establish domicile for tax revenue purposes.  The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may only tax those people who have voluntarily deemed themselves internal to the district.  Thus only legal entities have tax liability.

DRIVER is a For Hire / paid operator of a motor vehicle.  The term "motor vehicle" is defined as every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.

PASSENGER is someone who pays a fare for passage on a commercial carrier - airplane, bus, taxi, limousine, cruise ship, train or trolley, rather than a "guest" who travels without charge or fee.


It is necessary to go to the very root when looking at a complex problem.  It is obvious that most politicians and their key staff are attorneys/lawyers, who are minions in servitude to the bankers. The simplest solution is to start removing the attorneys from office.


Take note of these quotes:


"In a recent conversation with an official at the Internal Revenue Service, I was amazed when he told me that 'If the taxpayers of this country ever discover that the IRS operates on 90% bluff, the entire system will collapse'." -- Henry Bellmon, U.S. Senator (1969).

"Our tax system is based on individual self-assessment and voluntary compliance." -- Mortimer Caplin, former Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Internal Revenue Audit Manual (1975).

"Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions.  They are not ... they are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the U.S. for the benefit of themselves and their foreign and domestic swindlers, and rich and predatory money lenders.  The sack of the United States by the Fed is the greatest crime in history.  Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers, but the truth is the Fed has usurped the government.   It controls everything here and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will." -- Congressman Charles McFadden, Chairman, House Banking and Currency Committee, June 10, 1932.

"The real truth of the matter is, and you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson.  History depicts Andrew Jackson as the last truly honorable and incorruptible American president." -- President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, November 23, 1933 in a letter to Colonel Edward Mandell House. 


"... our system of credit is concentrated ... in the hands of a few men .. a power so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that [we had] better not speak above [our] breath when [we] speak in condemnation of it ... We have come to be ... completely controlled ... by ... small groups of dominant men." -- President Woodrow Wilson.

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes" -- Felix Frankfurter, United States Supreme Court Justice.

Sunday, April 17, 2011

Right to Travel

KNOW THE LEDGE TV presents TAJ TARIK BEY PART 2..MOOR WISDOM FROM THE EL...

KNOW THE LEDGE TV presents TAJ TARIK BEY-THE WISDOM OF THE MOORS PART 1

KNOW THE LEDGE TV presents TAJ TARIK BEY "THE WISDOM OF THE MOORS"

RISE UP, Rebuild (Upcoming event in Washington DC)

Upcoming Event in Washington DC 


RISE UP, Rebuild is an arts- and education-based organization for youth in DC and Baltimore.  We are all educators and artists in some capacity.  On April 23, 2011, RUR will host a Debate Demonstration between the two founders, Selah Bey and Shauntrice Art and their debate partners.  Selah will represent the affirmative and Shauntrice will argue the negative for the following resolution:

Moorish Science is the best movement for liberation.

This is primarily to demonstrate and advertise for our summer debate camp.  If you are interested in attending or supporting in any capacity, please contact Selah Bey at selah.bey7@yahoo.com OR riseuprebuild@yahoo.com. Peace.

 Time: April 23, 2011 from 2pm to 4pm
Location: ECAC (Emerging Community Arts Collective)
Street: 733 Euclid St NW
City/Town: Washington, DC
Website or Map: http://www.wix.com/rurArt/2011
Phone: 703 909-8643
Event Type: debate, demonstration
Organized By: Selah Bey

Local Moor speaks against racial slander in Fort Wayne County

We are experiencing an extreme amount of slander in Fort Wayne County Indiana. This attention is great because it opens the eyes of the people. Our brothers in Fort Wayne addressed this issue and I will also be posting a follow up letter. 


http://www.wane.com/dpp/news/Local-Moors-speak-out-deny-tax-fraud

Local Moors speak out, deny tax fraud

FORT WAYNE, Ind. (WANE) - A group of Fort Wayne Moors are denying any attempts to commit tax fraud after they claimed Moorish nationality over U.S. citizenship.
Since December, the Allen County Recorder's office has served at least 13 people who claimed to be Moors.
Recorder John McGauley called the encounters "interesting." He said the group of people brought lots of "strange" documents to be recorded. Some of the documents are titled "The Moorish Divine and National Movement of the World." They claim allegiance to the "Moorish Empire" and declare name corrections. Other documents claim power of attorney, but none of the documents carry any legal weight.
Now, some local Moors are speaking out. NewsChannel 15 met with two men who said they're Moorish sheiks and that they're not trying to create any trouble.
"We're not here to try to cause conflict." said Ptah El-Ali. "We're not here to try to overthrow the government. We will work with the government. But we just want to ensure and secure our rights."
He and another sheik, Jabbar Gaines-El, said the Moorish people are the same people normally referred to as "black" or "African-American."
"Moors is a race of people of the Earth. The wooly haired, the thick lips, big nose, copper tone skin," explained El-Ali. "Moors is a group of people. It's not a club. it's not a religious group. It's actually a race of people that has been here for since the ancient times. Actually from the ancient Moabites."
However, it's more than just an ethnicity for the two men and other Moors like them. It's a nationality that trumps any other.
"We never was a U.S. citizen to begin with," said El-Ali.
Following that idea, the two men conclude that Moors don't have to obey U.S. laws or fulfill any U.S. obligations like paying taxes. When NewsChannel 15's Aishah Hasnie asked the two men if they pay U.S. taxes, El-Ali declined to answer. Gaines-El said he did.
"I pay taxes, but I do so under the threat of arrest or coercion," said Gaines-El.
While they don't believe in U.S. laws, they said they record documents at the Allen County Recorders office to inform others of who they are.
"It's just given proper notice so that if we do get involved with some type of trouble, they would know our status," said El-Ali.
We asked them how realistic is it to live in a country and not follow its laws? The men said they follow the U.S. constitution and are confident any judge would side with their argument.
NewsChannel 15 intends to follow up on this story by speaking to a judge about Moorish ideas.

Saturday, April 16, 2011

The Prosecution Rests, but I Can’t,

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/10/opinion/10thompson.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1 

The Prosecution Rests, but I Can’t

John Thompson,

I SPENT 18 years in prison for robbery and murder, 14 of them on death row. I’ve been free since 2003, exonerated after evidence covered up by prosecutors surfaced just weeks before my execution date. Those prosecutors were never punished. Last month, the Supreme Court decided 5-4 to overturn a case I’d won against them and the district attorney who oversaw my case, ruling that they were not liable for the failure to turn over that evidence — which included proof that blood at the robbery scene wasn’t mine.
Because of that, prosecutors are free to do the same thing to someone else today.
I was arrested in January 1985 in New Orleans. I remember the police coming to my grandmother’s house — we all knew it was the cops because of how hard they banged on the door before kicking it in. My grandmother and my mom were there, along with my little brother and sister, my two sons — John Jr., 4, and Dedric, 6 — my girlfriend and me. The officers had guns drawn and were yelling. I guess they thought they were coming for a murderer. All the children were scared and crying. I was 22.
They took me to the homicide division, and played a cassette tape on which a man I knew named Kevin Freeman accused me of shooting a man. He had also been arrested as a suspect in the murder. A few weeks earlier he had sold me a ring and a gun; it turned out that the ring belonged to the victim and the gun was the murder weapon.
My picture was on the news, and a man called in to report that I looked like someone who had recently tried to rob his children. Suddenly I was accused of that crime, too. I was tried for the robbery first. My lawyers never knew there was blood evidence at the scene, and I was convicted based on the victims’ identification.
After that, my lawyers thought it was best if I didn’t testify at the murder trial. So I never defended myself, or got to explain that I got the ring and the gun from Kevin Freeman. And now that I officially had a history of violent crime because of the robbery conviction, the prosecutors used it to get the death penalty.
I remember the judge telling the courtroom the number of volts of electricity they would put into my body. If the first attempt didn’t kill me, he said, they’d put more volts in.
On Sept. 1, 1987, I arrived on death row in the Louisiana State Penitentiary — the infamous Angola prison. I was put in a dead man’s cell. His things were still there; he had been executed only a few days before. That past summer they had executed eight men at Angola. I received my first execution date right before I arrived. I would end up knowing 12 men who were executed there.
Over the years, I was given six execution dates, but all of them were delayed until finally my appeals were exhausted. The seventh — and last — date was set for May 20, 1999. My lawyers had been with me for 11 years by then; they flew in from Philadelphia to give me the news. They didn’t want me to hear it from the prison officials. They said it would take a miracle to avoid this execution. I told them it was fine — I was innocent, but it was time to give up.
But then I remembered something about May 20. I had just finished reading a letter from my younger son about how he wanted to go on his senior class trip. I’d been thinking about how I could find a way to pay for it by selling my typewriter and radio. “Oh, no, hold on,” I said, “that’s the day before John Jr. is graduating from high school.” I begged them to get it delayed; I knew it would hurt him.
To make things worse, the next day, when John Jr. was at school, his teacher read the whole class an article from the newspaper about my execution. She didn’t know I was John Jr.’s dad; she was just trying to teach them a lesson about making bad choices. So he learned that his father was going to be killed from his teacher, reading the newspaper aloud. I panicked. I needed to talk to him, reassure him.
Amazingly, I got a miracle. The same day that my lawyers visited, an investigator they had hired to look through the evidence one last time found, on some forgotten microfiche, a report sent to the prosecutors on the blood type of the perpetrator of the armed robbery. It didn’t match mine; the report, hidden for 15 years, had never been turned over to my lawyers. The investigator later found the names of witnesses and police reports from the murder case that hadn’t been turned over either. 

As a result, the armed robbery conviction was thrown out in 1999, and I was taken off death row. Then, in 2002, my murder conviction was thrown out. At a retrial the following year, the jury took only 35 minutes to acquit me.
The prosecutors involved in my two cases, from the office of the Orleans Parish district attorney, Harry Connick Sr., helped to cover up 10 separate pieces of evidence. And most of them are still able to practice law today.
Why weren’t they punished for what they did? When the hidden evidence first surfaced, Mr. Connick announced that his office would hold a grand jury investigation. But once it became clear how many people had been involved, he called it off.
In 2005, I sued the prosecutors and the district attorney’s office for what they did to me. The jurors heard testimony from the special prosecutor who had been assigned by Mr. Connick’s office to the canceled investigation, who told them, “We should have indicted these guys, but they didn’t and it was wrong.” The jury awarded me $14 million in damages — $1 million for every year on death row — which would have been paid by the district attorney’s office. That jury verdict is what the Supreme Court has just overturned.
I don’t care about the money. I just want to know why the prosecutors who hid evidence, sent me to prison for something I didn’t do and nearly had me killed are not in jail themselves. There were no ethics charges against them, no criminal charges, no one was fired and now, according to the Supreme Court, no one can be sued.
Worst of all, I wasn’t the only person they played dirty with. Of the six men one of my prosecutors got sentenced to death, five eventually had their convictions reversed because of prosecutorial misconduct. Because we were sentenced to death, the courts had to appoint us lawyers to fight our appeals. I was lucky, and got lawyers who went to extraordinary lengths. But there are more than 4,000 people serving life without parole in Louisiana, almost none of whom have lawyers after their convictions are final. Someone needs to look at those cases to see how many others might be innocent.
If a private investigator hired by a generous law firm hadn’t found the blood evidence, I’d be dead today. No doubt about it.
A crime was definitely committed in this case, but not by me.

A new Moor’s Survey on Expatriation

When dealing with the issue of Moorish Americans ( Moors born in America) and Expatriation. The issue of taxes is only one small issue in the entire construct of why one should expatriate. Expatriation (in abbreviated form, expat “not expatri” some argue that the “Patri” denotes patriarchal and allege that we are not patriarchal so we shouldn’t have to expatriate, the Moorish Questionnaire from the M.S.T.A. provides a question and answer “What is the title to our Ruler in Morocco?” and the answer is “Sultan” historically there were no female Sultans, today Morocco’s ruler chooses the title “King”) is a person temporarily or permanently residing in a country and culture other than that of the person's upbringing or legal residence. We must understand as Moorish Americans that were forced into a nation based off our civic ignorance and the fraud of our birth certificates. This forced action is what is called involuntary servitude.  Even while apart of this socio-economic construct, under a fictitious socio political construct we still are not treated as members of the human race, but members of the Black race, or Negroes are not attached to any nation in Africa. Quite interesting when the Black race is a U.S. construct and category for a minority political body apart of their nation.
All things Considered, we now are in a situation in which the very construct that enslaved us, Requires that we continue to pay for that enslavement. We are forced at gun point on the side of the road to sign contracts, or face being abducted and held captive for years in prison and penile institutions that are deemed private and profitable. Expatriation is not the answer to the prison and penile institutions, but it is a mere step towards the enjoyment of treaty birth rights and a solution to being wrongfully classified as a Black U.S. citizen, however non u.s. citizen foreign nationals are a minority in domestic U.S. prison institutions.  What is occurring is not law in any form, such institutions are corporate in nature, Expatriating is only stating that i now know where my allegiance is with a Moorish Nation.  Morocco and Mauritania are Moorish Nations in Africa. What is a Moorish Nation, you may ask?  I say a Nation found for Moors and by Moors. A nation with a Constitution signed bearing Moorish signature and seals.
I was born a Moor. Expatriation from the U.S. demonstrates that I am a Foreign National and not a Citizen of the United States as so many of my brethren maybe. Expatriation is voluntary process just as Naturalization or Nationalization is and no one can tell me who or what nation my allegiance is too but me, myself and I. What’s right for me may not be right for you. The United States Constitution secures treaties that pertains to Moors and applies generally to Foreign Nationals, Indians and the citizens of the several U.S. States. I am a member of the human race with a National Origin foreign and ally to the United States and not three fifths of a man and not to be treated as such. Proclaiming my National Origin is me saying that I belong to a Nation and have now devoted my attentions to the upliftment of my brothers and sisters in bondage. I conclude with a famous quote from Harriet Tubman who after leading many slaves to freedom quotes: “I could have save thousands more if they knew they were slaves”.
Moorish American Party
Caliphate of Amexem, Murakush

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Moors don’t need your permission to correct their status! Can a Moor in America get services without discrimination?

Moors don’t need your permission to correct their status! Can a Moor in America get services without discrimination?
Public Notice can be given through any media outlet. At its basic form it means to notify the public. This can be done through news, press, online articles, and even Internet blogs to name a few. Thus Public Notices become public records. This blog is to clear any questions as to why the Moorish Americans are filing documents with the County Clerk offices.It was monumental for me to learn that I am a Moorish American.  I was taught my entire life that I never had an illustrious past or an indigenous heritage or that all of my ancestors were in slavery, poverty and indentured servitude. I never let this hold me back. I always lived an average life, wife and 2 sons. Work as an Insurance Agent to support my family, pay taxes, clean record.
“So why are you at the recorders office, changing your name with some lengthy wordy documents and declaring you’re a Moorish American”?   The clerk asks in a curious tone
I look into the eyes of the clerk; the window to her soul, her look of curiosity had a slight tinge of concern.
“We want the public to take notice that we are no longer doing business as a Black, Negro or colored or African American, that we honor our ancient forefathers and fore-mothers and that we are Moorish Americans and our national origin is connected to Moorish Nations
At this moment her curiosity turns to complete confusion and I explain.
Before today I was involuntarily classified as being Black
Under the  U.S. federal directive 15 “Black” and “African American” are socio political constructs that is not connected to any Nation in Africa. Anything negatively seen is black and in a dismal state (Blackmail, Black-Male, Blackball, Black Friday etc…). Black is only the latest property brand name this generation is involuntarily carrying. In the words of John Henry Clarke “Black may tells us how we look but it does not define who we are. How do Adults in the United States of English descent take an Adjective and use it as a Noun and claim to be the majority.
However I have recently began to study my genealogy and my ancestors and their ancestry. And they were not slaves, even those forced into bondage and brought to the New World. A world actually known to my ancestors. I learned that all of my ancestors did not migrate to the Continental Americas forcibly on ships, as was taught in United States History class. I learned that I have ancestors that were in North, Central and South America and the adjoining islands hundreds and thousands of years before Columbus sailed the Atlantic in 1492 a year before the Treaty of Granada was signed and ratified, on November 25, 1491 between the Moorish sultan of Granada, Muhammad XII and Ferdinand and Isabella, the King and Queen of Castile, León, Aragon and Sicily.  
I learned that at one time the entire planet was one land mass. Modern Historians refer to this “Super continent” as Pangaea But my literature in my cultural traditions refer to this land mass as Amexem. If you notice the map of the world you will see that all the continents fit together as a puzzle. This is because at one time all the continents were connected. There was a large earthquake that caused the Atlantic Ocean and my ancestors ended up on both sides.
The first Americans were descended from aborigines proven to be related to the aborigines in Australia according to evidence in a BBC documentary titled “First Americans”. They then thrived for thousands of years until they were nice to various European Settlers, Spaniards, French and British nationals who from that moment forward tortured, colonized and systematically oppressed them mentally, spiritually, and physically for the next 519 years 4 months 9 days 10 hours 17 minutes and 42, 43, 44 seconds. The BBC documentary notes until this generation,  Americans Indians were believed to have descended from Asian ancestors who arrived over a land bridge between Siberia and Alaska and then migrated across the whole of north and south America. The land bridge was formed 11,000 years ago during the ice age, when sea level dropped.” However, the new evidence shows that these people did not arrive in an empty wilderness. Stone tools and charcoal from the site in Brazil show evidence of human habitation as long ago as 50,000 years. Chapter II of the Laws of Nations on the Mutual Commerce Between Nations states:  A country possessed by several nations at the same time. If at the same time two or more nations discover and take possession of an island or any other desert land without an owner, they ought to agree between themselves, and make an equitable partition; but, if they cannot agree, each will have the right of empire and the domain in the parts in which they first settled.
“And what I am needing from you today madam, is to simply do your job and calmly file this document and put it on record to the public, to set the record straight, that I am giving the world notice. That I am no longer a brand. I am no longer property. Furthermore that I have a Moorish National Origin”?  
The Record will show that the ancestors of the Moorish Americans descend from nobility with roots in the various geographic locations described as North, Central, and South American, North, Central and South Africa, Asia and Europe. Our ancestors were Moors and since we were born in the Americas abroad or not we have the birthright to proclaim before the nations of the earth our National Origin and that we are Moorish Americans.
I can’t imagine where her mind had escaped to for that brief moment, there was silence and I could see her deep in thought. She shrugged what seemed like anxiety off with a shrug of her shoulders, filed the document and provided me with a certified copy.
    Moorish American Party
Caliphate of Amexem
Murakush

Queen Issues the Declaration "Stop Playing"


The link posted above is vital for all mothers to read. It is important that we protect our children and everything starts with women.


This is a video for Empowerment of Moorish Women


Also for more information please check out the Queens website at  

Clarification of a matter FOR THE RECORD

http://journalgazette.com/article/20110327/LOCAL0201/303279925/1037/LOCAL02


The above article was blogged and I posted our response letter. We must address every article that seeks to damage us.






April 7, 2011


Attn: Mr. Frank Gray


Fax at 461-8893


Email: fgray@jg.net.




Dear: Mr. Frank Gray
Re: Odd twist: ‘Please, sir, can I be a Moor?’
This letter is to provide clarity in your article entitled. You indicated your concept of what happens at a government recorders office needed clarity so first let’s define what a government recorders office is. Webster’s Dictionary defines a government recorders office as follows: “The county office where instruments are recorded, giving public notice”. Webster’s Dictionary defines public notice as follows “An announcement made through newspaper, radio, community poster, internet blog, or other public means.” Government recording offices, as far as I’m concerned, are the most interesting places because they handle the information that deals with the public. Anytime notice is given to the public it can be done by putting it on record. This office is also used in addition to purposes named in your article, to file for business licenses and Permits. The beginnings of the Moorish Empire began when the 7 continents were connected in a “Super continent” completely connected in what modern day “historians” call Pangaea. Moors refer to this “Super continent” as Amexem. The people existing at this time were the original and indigenous inhabitants of this planet, of all regions and hemispheres. There was a giant earthquake thousands of years ago that created what we know as the Atlantic Ocean and separated “America” from “Africa”. I quote these titles due to the fact that modern Anglo names have been given to brand the land as well as brands on the indigenous people. These indigenous people are the same people that are found in modern day Morocco, Tunis and Tripoli. This is because again at one time these two land masses were conjoined. North America is described further as Northwest Amexum.


The people of these lands fell victim to European colonialism, branding and involuntary slavery, to this day and the history of an entire people has been stolen and distorted based on hatred. This treatment continues to this current day. Some of the brands that have been given to these people are Negro, black, colored, African, African American, Native American, Indian, etc. The main brand used today to classify these people is black. Black is a federal directive15 classification that has nothing to do with anthropology and is also defined as a color and in English it is known as an Adjective. We learn in the 3rd grade the differences between a proper noun and an adjective. How can an adjective be a person? This is done through branding. A brand is defined as the identity of a specific product, service, or business. (Webster’s). These people were given these brands and treated as property by English immigrants to America that later arrived from Europe. This treatment still exists to this day. Beyond the branding, these people have a stolen history of an entire people that were documented on this planet hundreds of thousands of years before 1492. Now let’s discuss the issue of taxes. By Law every United States Citizen must pay taxes. Every Dual Citizen is treated as a United States Citizen and required to pay taxes by law. Citizens of other Nations will not pay United States taxes but will pay taxes to their respective country. For instance Citizens of China would not pay United States Taxes. They would pay taxes in China.


There are no people immune from anything because regardless of ones status. One can still be arrested and thrown in jail without any regard to laws or the Constitution. (Rosa Parks)(Martin Luther King Jr.)


I am not able to comment on any of your examples for 3 reasons:


1. I am sure there have been many people that have all kinds of schemes. Schemes have nothing to do with Moorish Americans.


2. I am not able to comment on your source about Confidential Information in ones bank account. That would be against the law. Ones’ bank account is considered Confidential Information.


3. I am not able to speak on hypothetical situations that I am ignorant of. I am only given some information and it would be impossible to comment having been only given selected info.


You went on to say: "None of the documents carries any legal weight. You have to go to court to change your name. That’s the law. You can renounce your citizenship, I suppose, but that doesn’t give you immunity from the law or taxes."


86 F.3d 1159MOORISH SCIENCE TEMPLE of AMERICA, Inc.; Frank Applewhite; Curtis Owen, Appellants, v. Dennis BENSON, Warden; Steve Hokonson, Chaplain, Appellees. No. 95-2549. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted May 20, 1996. Filed May 29, 1996.


I. Name-change policy


3. The Moors claimed defendants violated their rights under the First Amendment and Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb to 2000bb-4, by refusing to allow inmates to append the suffix El or Bey to their names unless an inmate legally changes his name pursuant to Minnesota statutory procedure. The Moors alleged that their religion dictates the use of the suffixes and forbids them from going to court to change their names accordingly. They sought injunctive relief, requesting only that they not be punished for signing their name with the El or Bey suffix in conjunction with their prison number without first obtaining a legal name change. Along with an affidavit detailing their religious tenets regarding the use of the El or Bey suffix, the Moors submitted documentation from the national MSTA, which stated:


4. A member is not to go into court to have a name change, because you are not changing your name. You are proclaiming something you always have been by being born a Moorish American. One is not to change any existing records, but do all new business in the name of El or Bey, and put your nationality down or make it known, when and where it is called for.


III. Conclusion


14 With respect to the Moors' claims regarding the name-change policy, we affirm as to Hokonson and reverse and remand as to Benson.


http://openjurist.org/86/f3d/1159/moorish-science-temple-america-v-...


You noted and we agree. "You can renounce your citizenship, I suppose, but that doesn’t give you immunity from the law or taxes." "Exactly why people are recording these documents isn’t clear." "None of the documents carries any legal weight."


Accordingly, at least since the Supreme Court's ruling in Afroyim v. Rusk, 387 U.S. 253 (1967), it is no longer constitutionally sufficient that a person who was born or naturalized in the United States has voluntarily engaged in conduct deemed by law to be an act of expatriation. The person must also undertake such an act with the specific intention to relinquish his U.S. citizenship. See Terrazas, 444 U.S. at 263 (requiring that "the expatriating act [be] accompanied by an intent to terminate United States citizenship"). "[B]ecause of the precious nature of citizenship, it can be relinquished only voluntarily, and not by legislative fiat." Jolley v. INS, 441 F.2d 1245, 1248 (5th Cir. 1971). It is very clear that the County Clerk Office files various types of dissolutions real estate records, estate records, baptismal records, birth records, recording property transfers and pursuant to United States Code Title 8 Chapter 12 Subchapter I § 1101 subsection (7) The term “clerk of court” means a clerk of a naturalization court..


When the first Naturalization Act of 1790 came out an immigrant could file a Petition for Naturalization with "any common law court of record" having jurisdiction over his residence asking to be naturalized. Once convinced of the applicant’s good moral character, the court would administer an oath of allegiance to support the Constitution of the United States. The clerk of court was to make a record of these proceedings, and "thereupon such person shall be considered as a citizen of the United States." Thus the Clerks of Court traditionally delt with proceedings pertaining to Nationalization, Naturalization and Nationality. It is well established in Smith v. Erickson the clerk is considered the functional equivalent of the judge; by the same token, in this case the office of the Clerk should be treated as the Court itself See, e.g. , Smith v. Erickson , 884 F.2d 1108, 1111 (8th Cir. 1989).


According to the United States Constitution Article IV -Section 1, United States Code Title 28 Part V Chapter 115 § 1738, United States Code Title 28 Part V Chapter 131 § 2074, and Federal Rules Of Evidence Rule 803 and 902. (11) Records of religious organizations. Statements of births, marriages, divorces, deaths, legitimacy, ancestry, relationship by blood or marriage, or other similar facts of personal or family history, contained in a regularly kept record of a religious organization. (12) Marriage, baptismal, and similar certificates. Statements of fact contained in a certificate that the maker performed a marriage or other ceremony or administered a sacrament, made by a clergyman, public official, or other person authorized by the rules or practices of a religious organization or by law to perform the act certified, and purporting to have been issued at the time of the act or within a reasonable time thereafter. (13) Family records. Statements of fact concerning personal or family history contained in family Bibles, genealogies, charts, engravings on rings, inscriptions on family portraits, engravings on urns, crypts, or tombstones, or the like. (14) Records of documents affecting an interest in property.


The record of a document purporting to establish or affect an interest in property, as proof of the content of the original recorded document and its execution and delivery by each person by whom it purports to have been executed, if the record is a record of a public office and an applicable statute authorizes the recording of documents of that kind in that office. (15) Statements in documents affecting an interest in property. A statement contained in a document purporting to establish or affect an interest in property if the matter stated was relevant to the purpose of the document, unless dealings with the property since the document was made have been inconsistent with the truth of the statement or the purport of the document. (16) Statements in ancient documents. Statements in a document in existence twenty years or more the authenticity of which is established. Those types of documents are due full faith and credit.


"To back up that argument, some of the documents make reference to the 1857 Dred Scott decision, in which the Supreme Court ruled that no descendant of a slave could be a citizen of the United States."


Citing Dread Scott.


1. The facts upon which the plaintiff relies did not give him his freedom and make him a citizen of Missouri.


2. The clause in the Constitution authorizing Congress to make all needful rules and regulations for the government of the territory and other property of the United States applies only to territory within the chartered limits of some one of the States when they were colonies of Great Britain, and which was surrendered by the British Government to the old Confederation of the States in the treaty of peace. It does not apply to territory acquired by the present Federal Government by treaty or conquest from a foreign nation.


1. The territory thus acquired is acquired by the people of the United States for their common and equal benefit through their agent and trustee, the Federal Government. Congress can exercise no power over the rights of persons or property of a citizen in the Territory which is prohibited by the Constitution. The Government and the citizen, whenever the Territory is open to settlement, both enter it with their respective rights defined and limited by the Constitution.


2. Congress have no right to prohibit the citizens of any particular State or States from taking up their home there while it permits citizens of other States to do so. Nor has it a right to give privileges to one class of citizens which it refuses to another. The territory is acquired for their equal and common benefit, and if open to any, it must be open to all upon equal and the same terms.


3. Every citizen has a right to take with him into the Territory any article of property which the Constitution of the United States recognises as property.


4. The Constitution of the United States recognises slaves as property, and pledges the Federal Government to protect it. And Congress cannot exercise any more authority over property of that description than it may constitutionally exercise over property of any other kind.


5. The act of Congress, therefore, prohibiting a citizen of the United States from [p396] taking with him his slaves when he removes to the Territory in question to reside is an exercise of authority over private property which is not warranted by the Constitution, and the removal of the plaintiff by his owner to that Territory gave him no title to freedom.


The question is simply this: can a negro whose ancestors were imported into this country and sold as slaves become a member of the political community formed and brought into existence by the Constitution of the United States, and as such become entitled to all the rights, and privileges, and immunities, guarantied by that instrument to the citizen, one of which rights is the privilege of suing in a court of the United States in the cases specified in the Constitution?


It will be observed that the plea applies to that class of persons only whose ancestors were negroes of the African race, and imported into this country and sold and held as slaves. The only matter in issue before the court, therefore, is, whether the descendants of such slaves, when they shall be emancipated, or who are born of parents who had become free before their birth, are citizens of a State in the sense in which the word "citizen" is used in the Constitution of the United States. And this being the only matter in dispute on the pleadings, the court must be understood as speaking in this opinion of that class only, that is, of those persons who are the descendants of Africans who were imported into this country and sold as slaves.


http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0060_0393_Z...






A handful of people have been recording lengthy documents written in flowery, obfuscated language, proclaiming they are Moorish Americans. The Moorish empire, some of the documents claim, originated in northwest Africa and extended across the continent of Atlantis and into North, Central and South America long before anyone else was on the continent."Well this is because under their ecclesiastical doctrine: The Holy Koran of The Moorish Science Temple of America Divinely Prepared By The Noble Prophet Drew Ali Chapter Xlvii Egypt, The Capital Empire Of The Dominion Of Africa Records:
1. The inhabitants of Africa are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan.
2. Old man Cush and his family are the first inhabitants of Africa who came from the land of Canaan.
3. His father Ham and his family were second. Then came the word Ethiopia, which means the demarcation line of the dominion of Amexem, the first true and divine name of Africa. The dividing of the land between the father and the son.
4. The dominion of Cush, North-East and South-East Africa and North-West and South-West was his father's dominion of Africa.
5. In later years many of their brethren from Asia and the Holy Lands joined them.
6. The Moabites from the land of Moab who received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa; they were the founders and are the true possessors of the present Moroccan Empire. With their Canaanite, Hittite, and Amorite brethren who sojourned from the land of Canaan seeking new homes.
7. Their dominion and in-habitation extended from North-East and South-West Africa, across great Atlantis even unto the present North, South, and Central America and also Mexico and the Atlantis Islands; before the great earthquake, which caused the great Atlantic Ocean.


In closing I will say that, the Moors proclaiming themselves as Moorish American is simply one going on record to say that regardless of what anyone may have said or done to degrade a people’s history. That in fact we have a history also. And the history proceeded the year 1492. And that history was on this same land. The proclaiming of ones Nationality is a fundamental right afforded by the creator and the constitution. Filing such documents on record is to only inform the public. Whether on record or not we are Moorish Americans by consanguine relationship, We trace our roots back to the Ab-Original indigenous Inhabitants of this planet. I hope that this post gives you clarity; you had indicated that you were unclear of exactly what these documents were and what they were for. If you have questions and need further clarity please ask. Attached is the legalities behind everything stated in this letter. This information was gathered from the United States Constitution which dates back to the 1700s. In fact most of our laws today also trace back hundreds of years. So to provide further clarity, if the constitution was written in the 1700s and it is still legally in effect, a treaty that was crafted more modern than the constitution would also still be in effect. The United States Constitution applies to Foreign nationals, the Several States and Indian Tribes under the 1st Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act we have the right to believes all of the above.


El & Bey’s of the


Moorish American Party

Monday, April 11, 2011

Establishment of Communities to Enjoy Immunities

With the many different unincorporated and incorporated non profit or for profit entities part and partial to the Moorish Divine and National Movement, it is important to note their currently does not exist any collective Moorish National treasury for each of them to deposit Zakat’s to go towards the establishment of other Moorish Businesses or commercial enterprises to bring about solutions to our commercial complications and dis-enfranchisement's. This is a prime example why in America there exist no Moorish Colleges, Universities, Hospitals, libraries, Mosques, Temples, Private Schools, Caliphates (States) and Emirates (Counties-Municipalities) i.e. local corporate governments.


Our forefathers had a profound influence not just upon Spain but the whole of Western Europe. Indeed, it has been said that they laid the foundations of the Renaissance that brought Europe out of the intellectual and physical gloom of the Middle Ages. In the 10th Century Cordoba, for example, was not just the capital of Al Andalus (Moorish Spain) but also one of the most important cities in the world, rivaling Baghdad and Constantinople. It boasted a population of 500,000 (200,000 more than now) and had street lighting, fifty hospitals (with running water!), three hundred public baths, five hundred mosques and seventy libraries – one of which held some 500,000 books. All of this, at a time when London had a largely illiterate population of around 20,000 and had forgotten the technical advances of the Romans some 600 hundred years beforehand. More importantly, our forefathers brought enormous learning to Spain which, over the coming centuries, would percolate through to the rest of Europe. In fact, it was the intellectual achievements of our Forefathers that were to have a lasting effect, well beyond their more prosaic contributions towards construction, irrigation systems and agriculture.


Moorish American Party


Caliphate of Amexem